In this blog post, I am using an "X-ray" process so I can see the "bones" of my research project argument. At this point, my research project is still a work in progress so this post serves as a part of my revision process.
My thesis statement is: Cancel culture captures an American zeitgeist of people online who group together to shun and humiliate celebrities and influencers for the things they have done. My first supporting point that argues the how or why of my zeitgeist is: Canceling someone rarely does anything long term. My second supporting point that argues the how or why of my zeitgeist is: People who participate in it just spam things instead of explaining sharing their opinion. My third supporting point that argues the how or why of my zeitgeist is: No proof against the one being cancelled most of the time. My counter argument and rebuttal is
My prediction is:
My conclusion revisits the thesis statement and makes a call to action, a prediction, and a full circle closing of the argument. X-ray summary: I need to work on my predictions for the future. I made it based on how I feel and how cancel culture has been progressing over the years, but I don't have a source on it so it isn't really credible. I should also work on my rebuttal a little more, maybe put it in a separate paragraph so it is more prominent. As it is now its blended in with another paragraph and Is not really doing anything to help my point where it is right now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
ArchivesCategories |